Skip to main content

Timeline for New Design Launched

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.wordpress.stackexchange.com/ with https://wordpress.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 7, 2013 at 15:53 answer added icc97 timeline score: 1
Mar 11, 2011 at 6:00 comment added kaiser @Jin: a little better now. The padding-bottom issue still is present. An icon (as described with css background definition) would still be better and easily possible without php.
Mar 11, 2011 at 1:36 comment added Jin @kaiser, all of our SE sites use the same underlying engine. We don't use php. for engine related suggestions, feel free to post on meta.stackoverflow.com as for the icon vs. bgcolor, i think it's a matter of personal preference. I have darkened the accepted answer bg some.
Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 comment added kaiser @Jin: <- ... or just make something only with css like .answered-accepted { background: url(check-mark-icon.png) 0 6px no-repeat; }. Sidenote: The definition for .answered-accepted strong { padding: 0 0 5px; } should be lowered to 3px. Looks kinda funny at the moment and makes it even harder to see the "answer" string belonging to the number above. Another one: There's no difference between "answer" (single) and "answeres" (multiple). Currently it's "16 answer".
Mar 11, 2011 at 1:16 comment added kaiser @Jin: I would just set a background-image(-icon) that resides left or below the number itself. Or, if you have access to the php output (templates?), you could set if ( condition_accepted_answer === true ) echo '<span class="check-mark"></span>'.$num_of_answers_for_Q; and set the checkmark to something like .answered-accepted span { display: inline; height: 16px; width: 16px; float: left; clear: none; background: url(/css/check-mark-icon.png) no-repeat 0 0; }. A height/width of 16px is fine from a short look/meassuring.... ->
Mar 10, 2011 at 19:30 comment added Jin @kaiser i see. I can't really change the text since that's coming from the backend, for all the sites. I can certainly darken the green some.
Mar 10, 2011 at 19:21 comment added kaiser @Jin: I know and that was what i wanted to point out (replace "answered" with "has accepted answer"): light green is hard to see. Impossible on monitors with low contrast. Better would be a "check mark" (for visual difference).
Mar 10, 2011 at 19:06 comment added Jin @Kaiser, only "Accepted Answered" questions have the light green background. A question that's answered, but with no accepted answer doesn't have a bg.
Mar 10, 2011 at 18:43 comment added kaiser One thing i really don't appreaciate from point of useability: The light green background of "answer" in the list of questions, when it's answered. Would be really more clear to have a "check" sign over there to separate more quickly.
Feb 25, 2011 at 19:50 answer added Ashfame timeline score: 0
Feb 23, 2011 at 7:40 answer added Саша Стефановић timeline score: 0
Feb 17, 2011 at 8:57 answer added tkit timeline score: -1
Feb 16, 2011 at 3:07 answer added kevtrout timeline score: 1
Feb 15, 2011 at 19:04 answer added Rarst timeline score: 2
Feb 15, 2011 at 17:12 answer added t31os timeline score: 4
Feb 15, 2011 at 17:09 answer added Wyck timeline score: 1
Feb 15, 2011 at 15:22 answer added kaiser timeline score: 0
Feb 15, 2011 at 13:58 answer added rsman timeline score: 1
Feb 15, 2011 at 13:44 answer added Drake timeline score: 5
Feb 15, 2011 at 6:42 answer added Denis de Bernardy timeline score: 3
Feb 15, 2011 at 4:27 answer added Noel Tock timeline score: 2
Feb 15, 2011 at 3:32 answer added Mike Hudson timeline score: 1
Feb 15, 2011 at 1:47 answer added goldenapples timeline score: 4
Feb 15, 2011 at 0:24 answer added Grant Palin timeline score: 1
Feb 14, 2011 at 22:41 answer added Fernando Briano timeline score: 1
Feb 14, 2011 at 21:32 answer added user66 timeline score: 7
Feb 14, 2011 at 21:30 history asked Jin CC BY-SA 2.5