Timeline for Are any affiliate links appropriate/allowed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 11:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/ with https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.wordpress.stackexchange.com/ with https://wordpress.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 21, 2011 at 1:22 | vote | accept | Travis Northcutt | ||
| Aug 20, 2010 at 3:56 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | It was decided that affiliate links would be okay, if fully and clearly disclosed. But Stack Overflow reserves the right to rewrite affiliate links (which they already do with Amazon links on some of the sites). | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 15:07 | answer | added | Jan Fabry | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 14:10 | comment | added | Travis Northcutt | That could very well be the case - good point, I didn't read it like that the first time around. I suggest we determine what we want the rules to be here, and acting accordingly. | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 13:29 | comment | added | nobody | The section in the SO FAQ, as far as I can tell, is for products which you are directly affiliated with, something you actively have a part in, not affiliate links. | |
| Aug 18, 2010 at 13:11 | history | asked | Travis Northcutt | CC BY-SA 2.5 |