Timeline for Completeness of Answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2019 at 8:17 | vote | accept | Andrew Bartel | ||
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| May 5, 2013 at 4:36 | vote | accept | Andrew Bartel | ||
| Apr 2, 2019 at 8:17 | |||||
| May 5, 2013 at 4:35 | comment | added | Andrew Bartel | Thanks s_ha_dum, I appreciate the response. Marking this one as accepted since Chip gave it a +1 :) | |
| May 3, 2013 at 19:08 | comment | added | Chip Bennett | +1. Code provided in answers is intended to be "proof-of-concept" or "example" code, not necessarily "exact, working copy pasta". Generally, questions should be asked with enough specificity to provide such "proof-of-concept" code, and if not, then the question almost certainly needs to be improved/clarified, or closed as not a real question. | |
| May 3, 2013 at 17:45 | comment | added | t31os | That pretty much sums up my sentiments on the subject. | |
| May 3, 2013 at 16:43 | history | answered | s_ha_dum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |