Timeline for Should commercially promotional usernames be allowed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2010 at 2:16 | comment | added | MikeSchinkel Mod | Hi @Robert Cartaino & @tnorthcutt: I didn't realize that meta doesn't affect reputation. That makes me look at it differently. Thanks! | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 12:27 | comment | added | Travis Northcutt Mod | Mike, I'll echo what Robert said. Don't take the downvotes personally. No rep in Meta, so the votes are just a good way of showing which ideas the community prefers. Thanks for contributing to the discussion! | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 2:03 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @MikeSchinkel: Definitely don't take the down-votes personally (wasn't me). They simply mean that someone does not agree with your proposal and they're NOT to be taken personally. That's one of the big reasons we removed reputation-for-votes from meta, so people would be more inclined to make suggestions and offer real opinions on this stuff. | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 0:05 | comment | added | MikeSchinkel Mod | I realize after my down-voted answer (really don't like having brainstorming discussions down-voted, guess I'll be more careful with my opinion on these from now on) that my concern is not company name but people using one account for (what may appear to be) multiple people. See my comments below as to why. | |
| Sep 9, 2010 at 18:06 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 2.5 |